okay, you're a major media outlet and you decide you want to write a major media article about how unsafe the city is.  using your standard major media techniques and sitting at your major media desk, you go through your stock photography (natch!) to find images which really drive home the point.  remember your plot points: summer, crime, danger, violence, neighborhood.

i'm frankly rather mystefied over what the editors of the post are seeking to convey here.  and i'm not being deliberately obtuse to make a point.  is the person on the bike supposed to represent danger, or be an embodiment of violence?  is the issue that he's riding on the sidewalk while families are playing?  that makes no sense.  i'm not sure how the photo helps to validate the "plenty of evidence" assertion.  what is going on here?