the inaugural quicksilver winter solstice series has come and gone. there were some high points and some low points, but my general impression was that almost everyone who came had a good time. i hope that people take the time to give a little thanks to eric marshall for his idea and his organization. he came up with a slew of pretty innovative ideas: electronic registration with barcode scanning, drive through registraiton, heated community tent with amenities, and pulling together a consortium of clubs to help spread out the workload. with the exception of barcode scanning, none of these ideas are new but the collective impact certainly made for a nice environment at a training race. the fees were kept low. juniors raced for free, and were not even charged the USCF and local organization fees which the promoter subsidized. as a result, junior attendance was prety healthy and overall attendance was solid as well, building each week.
i can't say much about what was going on during the last week as I needed to drive the pace car for all three races. it was sort of fun, a different perspective on the event. it was nice as each race was won from a breakaway so there was some work to do, mostly corraling stray cars off the course. just to give you a feel for what it's like, here's what most of my day looked like.

exciting, eh? you want more? you got it. the winning break in the A race on the last lap.

look carefully, there are at least two riders trying valiantly to get across. the closest one is an artemis rider and i wish i knew who it was because i'd like to show that rider some love. the break here is absolutely flying and the lone rider was making up time on them. incredible. maybe eric engle? even in the full size photo it's impossible to tell. so that's my day.
other than that, registration ran pretty smoothly. eric marshall's new system is just so spiffy.

I have some videos of the system working. it's about 15 seconds from scanning of the license to a wet-ink signature on a fully populated standard release. that's fast. it's about an equal amount of time for money changing and handing a number and yet again telling the rider the number goes on the right side. if you all have questions, concerns or comments, you can reach eric here.
and speaking of spiffy, the signed copy of training and racing with a power meter from the hunter allen of the peaks coaching group and cycling peaks software went to Jared Neiters from Warrenton Cycling. thanks to hunter for providing this nice prize. and good luck to jared on a productive season.

when the intial plan for the race came out, eric said he would institute a drive through registration system. agitators and player haters postured, saying that the nexus of cars and bicycle sin northern virgina was already a sufficiently spicy stew without adding this to the mix. we disagreed and ran with the plan. but racing union is all about democracy. we set up an official protest area where those who felt obligated ot act ont heir convictions could use prominent space to make their point. it was cordoned off for the safety of the protestors by several cones and a knee high length of mabra cyclocross tape.

and because we just knew the prostestors would have ridden their bikes out, we felt obligated to make it easy for them by providing paperboard (unbleached, and partially recycled, but not made from natural hemp fibers) and non-toxic pens.

alas, the state you see this site in is the state it remained in. unoccupied. "build it and they will come" is how the saying goes. but the saying is wrong. they did not come. one might assume that this meant that everyone was cool with what we were doing. au contraire, mon ami. there was apparently a mix up in some junior results which generated a disappointing email exchange.
original message:
From: somewhat.understandably.disgruntled.parent@emailinghost.com
Date: March 6, 2006 10:26:38 PM EST
To: race.promoter@promoting.club's.website
Subject: RE: Fw: VACycling: yesterday's Quicksilver results
Dear Mr. Marshall, Your e-mail requests that corrections and changes be sent to you. My son and another junior placed first and second in the race on 3/4/06; but there was a mix-up, perhaps no one was paying enough attention to notice they were juniors and not with the group in front of them. In your reply, you state you cannot do anything about this. What kind of mistakes can you fix? All the racers I know would rather have accurate race results then ghiradelli chocolates and a heated tent. I cannot believe that no one can correct the posted results. These are two juniors that want to keep moving up in racing. My son (name withheld) rode with his teammate, (name withheld) to the race on Saturday, and they needed to leave before the results were posted. I realize this was a training race, but if any results are to be posted, the sponsors, like everyone, should care that they are correct.
eric's response:
>> What kind of mistakes can you fix?
Just minor ones, like misspelled names, different club affiliations, et cetera. Also, 3rd in the junior race, as the officials wrote down a racer number that didn't exist. I can understand your frustration, but I hope you can see the logistical difficulties in trying to verify results changes after the officials have disbanded along with their results note. Until the rules are changed, we'll all have to use the 15 minute protest period.
and the conclusion:
I guess we will skip Quicksilver next year. Chocolates and heated tents mean little if judges miss a sprint finish and now you tell me, gave credit to a 3rd place finisher that didn't exist. If that can be corrected, I fail to see how assigning a win to the wrong person cannot be. I appreciate your prompt response, but frankly it is way behind the times.
now i need to be really clear here: these are my opinions and my opinions alone. nothing i say, at all, at any time, should be construed to be speaking for the series, the promoter, or any of the clubs involved in promoting the series. that said, this is a regrettable occurence. i am tempted to chafe at the anger of the parent. a big part of what the racing union is all about is keeping a perspective on these things. the promoter offered you a free race and even subsidized your child by paying the mandatory fees and you are snubbing the race over something that they have no control over. i also understand the frustration expressed in the email. when someone works hard for a good result, it's really a shock to have it pulled away and attributed to someone else. the specific point i want to address is the misplaced anger in the email. don't be mad at the race or the promoter or the venue. this was an unfortunate event, and it happens all the time because things go wrong or there is confusion or fate conspires against you.
but first, let's understand the process. it is the job of the officials that are assigned by usa cycling, the national federation that provides the structure under which most races are run, to administer and adjudicate the results of the race. the rules of racing and the various officials manuals that provide guidance on administering events are here. if you show up at a race and you don't know the rules, you don't have a leg to stand on. the officials post results as soon as possible after each event. at that point, there is a 15 minute protest period. if a rider believes that there is an error in the preliminary results, they should speak up during this time. if the results are changed, a new 15 minute protest period is initiated. if a protest period expires, the results are generally deemed final. however, to address the specific point made by somewhat understandably disgruntled parent above, if there are known errors in the results, they should be rectified. in particular, see the yellow sidebar on page 28 here for more information. the best thing for everyone is to know how the system works and to treat it with whatever seriousness you feel it deserves.
what bugs me is the anger that gets redirected towards the promoter, race and venue. if you are angry enough to boycott an event, it would certainly have been worth it to stick around for the 15 minute protest period. i have had a considerable number of experiences as a promoter with other races in which riders spent hours contacting other racers and trying to produce testimonials that the event actually unfolded in a way that is different than the results say they did. no problem, but think about it. hours of frustration and avoiding races and venues when you could have just stuck around for the results and the protest period. racers who show up to a venue 2-3 hours early to chew the fat, apply the proper embrocation, locate their teammates, set up the trainer, tune the bike, and prepare their sports nutrition supplements somehow can't stick around after the race to make sure their carefully prepared and hard-won efforts have been recognized?
my personal opinion is that these conflicts stem from an unrealistic assessment of how bike racing works: it's not always perfect or safe or fair. as i mentioned above, mistakes happen from time to time. bicycle racers are not perfect, officials are not perfect. mistakes get made. technology fails. oversights are....inevitable. there is no justice. if the world was just, there would be no need for the revolution that the racing union is propogating. remember that cycling is a hobby. you can be passionate about it, but at the end of the day, it's just a really fun way to spend some time and some money.
- - - posted by scott