the racing union re-asserts it's position in the vanguard of the revolution in cycling.
while some are content to simply complain, we offer a series of proposals to help bring cycling into line with the values of it's participants. we have no doubt the special interests (the predatory, capitalist cabal of promoters and the unanswering bureaucracy of our local association) will fight these proposals tooth and nail. we seek nothing less than a revolution in cycling, an inversion of the existing power pyramid and a return of authority to cyclists. we ask for the support of all of you towards these proposals, which we will advance at the annual meeting this fall. help us bring a new day to cycling in the mid-atlantic.
proposal #1: independent verification and auditing of all mabra race results
there has been considerable concern regarding the timeliness and/or accuracy of race results. literally thousands of promoter/official hours are sunk into resolving whether racer x or racer y is really the appropriate recipient of 39th place. given the absolutely critical importance of proper results data, the current levels of safeguards in place can hardly be deemed adequate. we offer a three pronged solution to the current procedures in place
- retention of a subcontractor as a finish results auditor.
- creation of a mabra board member position: race results ombudsman
- creation of a paid mabra position: media archivist

finish results auditor: we propose that mabra contract with one of the big five accounting firms. this firm would function as an external auditor to existing usac officials and their actions. they would be formally tasked with validating the procedures and results used to generate unofficial and official race results. they would function independently and would not answer to the mabra board, but rather to the racer ombudsman (described below). the firm would also be tasked with providing quarterly reports of it's monitoring activities, and any resultant findings, to the racing community at large.
race results ombudsman: we propose that mabra create a full time, salaried board position to interface between officials, promoters and racers. the disposition of this official would be to represent racers and advocate on their behalf. the ombudsman would also be tasked with several additional functions. the writing of a bi-weekly summary of activity would help racers to better understand how the race scoring process works, and what is being done to ensure that results are timely, accurate and fair. full accounting of any arbitration activities would be described. a monthly summary would also be prepared in advance for each mabra bod meeting so that this issue can receive the attention is deserves.

media archivist: since all race finishes are currently captured on video, and in light of the staggering volume of race paperwork that mabra and the uscf see fit to employ, it defies reason that the video tape from each race is not captured, stored, labelled and made available on the mabra web site. this proposal seeks to create a full time, salaried archivist who will compile and catalog digital video of each race finish and produce and maintain a section of the mabra web site dedicated to the display of raw race finish footage. this added layer of transparency should work in tandem with the previously mentioned measures to add confidence to the race reports that are currently generated.

we find it important at this point to denote that this is not an attempt to denegrate the performance of mabra officials or the current mabra board of directors. rather, these added measures and safeguards should serve to free up these harried volunteers to actually perform their existing tasks. the newly created positions will bring an entire tier of dedicated staff to solving these crucial problems.
the costs for this proposal will undoubtedly be tremendous. but speaking rhetorically, is there any price that can be put on a true rendering of the achievement of each racer? is there any price that can be affixed to verifying that the outcome of a given event is rendered with fidelity? we believe the answer is no and humbly submit that this is not only a just but necessary change in mabra structure.
proposal #2: mandatory drug testing at all mabra sanctioned events
there have been multiple claims over the last several years that certain riders are using performance enhancing products. this is a damning charge. the most unfortunate aspect of this type of charge is that it is impossible to negate. there is no system in place to test for the presence of banned compounds at the local or regional levels of cycling. while we firmly believe that drug use is not a problem at the local level, we can never be certain. this uncertainty is what leads, in many cases, to speculation and, regrettably, character defamation.
given that there are clear rules regarding what cannot be taken (ref: www.usada.org) but virtually no enforcement, we propose that mabra adopt a demonstration program of testing. the testing will follow current usada procedures and use approved facilities, as opposed to introducing new protocols or standards. this is proposed as an increase in monitoring as opposed to a change in procedure.

after considerable discussion, we have two alternative proposals regarding whom the testing should be carried out on. the first simply states that the top three in each field will provide samples according to current usada guidelines. the samples would be collected by a uscf official who was on the race crew specifically to collect, inventory and manage these samples. transfer of the samples would be accomplished by the official under the oversight of the chief referee and in coordination with the labaratory which would be processing the samples. an alternative proposal, which would admittedly be substantially cheaper, would be to only test those racers in category 5 and juniors events. the rationale for this is that an active intervention with beginning cyclists will yield the most benefits in the long run, and deterrence and behaviour modification with experienced cyclists is not as likely to offer the same return on investment. our preference would be a more thorough testing regimen that covered all fields, but we acknowledge that the substantial costs that mabra will inevitably bear in conducting this important and necessary monitoring will cause people to look for ways to make the process easier.
we believe that supporting this initiative will help to instill confidence that races are being conducted on an even playing field.
proposal #3: promoters must offer child care both before and during master's events

many cyclists are unable to participate in events because of family committments. the inability to find a babysitter, a last minute cancellation, a relative who suddenly takes sick; any one of these could be the cause of a race day no-show. we propose that promoters must retain the services of licensed, bonded babysitters who can look after children while racers are registering, warming up, racing and cooling down.
this proposal has two clear benefits. first, cyclists can race without worry about arrangements for care of their young ones. they need not worry about whether their plans will be shifting at the last minute. secondly, this will clearly help to make events more family friendly. some children dread the inevitable death march to and from the race. in place of current situation which ranges from abandonment to forced child labor in feed zones, we will see constructive games and educational diversions. for younger kids, multimedia programs concerning alternative transportation can be made available. for older kids, learning how to score a race or replace a bottom bracket might offer a step up in moving on the next level of becoming a helpful uscf official or mechanic.

we ask for your support in this proposal which we see as a win-win situation for kids and parents.
proposal #4: creation of a casual dress code for all cyclists while at at mabra events
mabra has, over the last several years, sought sponsorship for both races and ranking systems such as the bar. in seeking this sponsorship, mabra has sought to assure potential sponsors that the racing demographic overlaps with their intended customer base. the racing union strongly disavows the contention that sponsorship is beneficial to amateur sports. our manifesto lays out a very clear case for this. however, we support the goal of improving races and racing throughout the mid-atlantic. to that end, and given that mabra is insistent on pursuing sponsorship, we feel that mabra can, and should, do considerably more to help ensure that the race day environment is appealing to potential sponsors.
in looking for actions which can be taken, one need not re-invent the wheel. other sports have confronted these issues and have come up with well thought out solutions which we can implement immediately. the best example of this is the recent decision by the national basketball association to institute a casual dress policy for all athletes who are at an event, in any capacity, but not explicitly suited to take the court. the dress code itself is described here and examples of it's newsworthiness are found here and here.

many cyclists attend events in a number of capacities. they may be in the feed zone, waiting to help their teammates with nutrition or hydration. they may be spectators, who were shut out of electronic registration but want to see their peers lock horns on the gridiron. or they may be racing three races that day and find themselves killing the 4 hours between the end of their last event and the start of their next event.
in all of these cases, having the cyclists adopt a business casual dress code would ensure a professional looking atmosphere for the event. the popular image of cyclists as goatee-sporting, mountain dew swilling, pierced and tattoo having gen x-ers is not bringing in one red cent. only by showing that mabra is truly committed to presenting cycling as a mature, urbane, socially representative sport, can we possibly move ahead in acquiring the millions of sponsorship dollars needed to advance the sport locally.
there is a precedent for this proposal. uscf officials are adamant and vocal in mandating that any and all cyclists at a race who are on a bike must have a helmet. this is regardless of whether they are currently racing, racing at another time, or not racing at all during the day but merely spectating. our proposal is entirely in keeping with the spirit of this rule; it's only the item(s) or garment(s) in question that are being regulated.
summary: the racing union seeks your support in adopting these proposals, and some subsequent proposals we will roll out shortly. we will, to a limited extent, consider feedback, potential modifications or amendments. however, we feel the proposals are very well reasoned and articulated. those cyclists considering major modifications should submit alternative proposals as per the guidelines provided by the mabra secretariat in advance of the meeting.