Wednesday, May 10, 2006

bike to work day is coming.  and i can just feel the eye-rolling, foot-tapping, subject-changing apathy from many of the cyclists i hang around with in d20.  i have always found this cryptic.  people intuitively accept that they have to offer a complete mentoring program for junior cyclists.  they jump at the chance to help them understand the basics and build confidence.  people do a great job of helping new racers appreciate what they need to carry on their frozen winter training rides; those rides that call out for reliable equipment and over-preparedness rather than stupid-light racing stuff that will need to be field repaired multiple times with numb fingers.  people embrace training rides, training races and racing clinics as a way to acquire experience, learn the necessaries and build their fundamentals.

so here's the point.  why should we treat recreational riding and/or commuting any other way.  we're happy to take prospective cyclists out for 3 hour hammer-fests but we cringe at the idea of crawling down the custis trail with 2-3 people who are new to commuting.  why is that?  you think i'm blowing smoke or making this up.  show up at your next training ride in a t-shirt and tell them you're from potomac peddlers and just feel the scorn settle in.  this is a generalization, but i will bet you that most everyone reading this has had some experience along these lines, on either side of the insults.

the union is all about bringing the change.  we don't just call people out, we're here to help, to propose solutions.  and i've tried to be nice about this but i've about had my fill.  i hereby announce that bike to work day is mandatory for all racing cyclists.  you will not do your regularly scheduled workout.  you will not do 2x10' sprints in a 96 inch gear.  you will not do hill repeats followed by a soy and algae protein shake.  you may ride at hains point at noon as long as your other obligaitons have been fulfilled (see below).  instead, you will support the washington metro areas largest bicycle-centered, alternative transportation rally of the year.

you will go to the waba web site and you will register.  after that...and you listen up good now 'cause this is the important part...you will go and find someone who lives close to you who has never commuted or who rarely commutes.  you will convince them to come and ride to work with you.  you will help them check their bike and volunteer any parts they need to fix up their ride from the volumnious stash you keep in your basement.  you will escort them to their place of work on bike to work day.  you will carry extra gear for them if then need it.  you will buy them coffee and maybe even a doughnut.  and in the afternoon, you will repeat the process, but in the opposite direction.  in doing so, you will hopefully make a new friend and possibly impact someone's life for the better.

- - - posted by scott

5/10/2006 5:32:17 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [1]  | 
 Tuesday, May 09, 2006

so I'm finally getting back up on my feet again.  i had a very hard crash at bunny hop this past weekend on the last lap.  i do not have the clearest memory of what actually happened.   i received several emails which all basically said the same thing: you're really, really, really lucky to have walked away from that crash.  it was a doozy.  i remember a rider in front, and slightly to the left of me, unclipping his right foot and doing two big wobbles with his handlebars.  and the next thing i know, i am maintaining a low earth orbit and thinking: "houston, we have a negative on that trajectory..."

I spotted the curb i hit on the way down and impacted it pretty hard.  since i figured my number was up anyway, i tried to be gracious by positioning myself between andrew hong and the tree so he would come through it all unscathed.  we do what we can to help others.  it is the union way. 

and speaking of help, i needed it.  that's the bad part.  the good part is that i got it, almost immediately, and in amounts which I still find gratifying.  lots of people tried to help and that was nice.  again, i don't have the clearest recollection of what was going on but i felt people trying to move me and trying to help.  my clearest recollection is of michael rp, lew strader an arch mckown trying to get me settled and encouraging me to get into the ambulance.  i was recalcitrant.  I stood up, but turned pale and thought i was going to vomit, so I went with what lew and arch were lobbying for.  below is a dramatic re-enactment of the scene:

 

oh, except that they insisted on putting me on a backboard with a neck collar and using huge webbing restraint straps which ran right over my road rash.  yeah, that's the ticket.  it felt as though they had taken me straight to the dirt road section at poolesville.  the ambulance was jumping around through potholes and all sorts of other stuff.  we arrive and they check me right in.  i won't belabor the experience.  i was unfortunate in that there were several large scale trauma cases and a helicopter trauma case flown in while i was there.  so service was at a premium.  honestly, that i was ready for.  the thing i was not ready for was the surreal problems that particular emergency room was having.  wacked out people wandering around the nurses station, being yelled at to go back to their rooms.  police officers patrolling the emergency room and what not.  tere was an absence of the healing vibe i was seeking. 

I was released late.  the doctor came in to have a pow wow with me.  the blood and urine work showed no signs of internal bleeding, but he was very concerned about the fact that I appeared clinically dehydrated and had exceedingly low blood sugar and that this might be complicating the blood work.  my wife tried to calmly explain that I had been racing, that i had been denied food and had been provided virtually no fluids until they knew my situation.  she continued to elaborate on that theme, stating that it if you really stopped to think about it, it wasn't at all surprising that i'd be in that sort of state.  she was just getting warmed up, but i had to sort of intervene at this point.  i just wanted to go home and i got what i wanted.

so it's all over now.  i'm healing up and i'll be back in a few weeks.  this event has been regrettable, but it happens.  i will mostly remember the kind words and thoughts people passed along.  you guys always show up to races and training rides with your game face on but you're a bunch of hallmark-card-writing softies.  i've still got all the emails to prove it. 

a few random notes:

  • my knees: several people told me that they thought i had broken or shattered one or both tibia.  that's not the case.  I have bone spurs in both knees surrounded by all the normal hardware and software.  lucky me. 
  • small world: josh was my ambulance/emt attendant.  turns out he worked at the bike doctor store as a mechanic for two years.  he's a mountain biker and seemed really interested in road cycling.  angel, my emergency room charge nurse, is some sort of spinning junkie and is looking to get out on bike trails with her three year old son.  she asked me about local trails and roads and we talked about waba and other clubs.  and while i rarely get tired of talking about the revolution, i was pretty tired of talking about cycling by midnight.  the point, however, is that we often see the world as us (very small group of competitive cyclists) and them (everybody else in the whole &$#@ world).  it's not like that and I'll have some posts up about bike to work day soon that i think will help back this up and hopefully present a more inclusive vision.
  • and lastly, you people make me sick.  it was simply unbelievable the number of emails i got asking for pictures of the carnage.  it's like bike porn for you jackals.  even the ever cordial and mild-mannered luecke was circling like a vulture and asking for pics.  i was going to say no on principle, but i have no shame, so here you go.

this is pretty representative of my right side.  only the huge gouge out from under my knee's bone spur requires coverage.  the rest has dried out reasonably well and stopped weeping.  i used to pack these things with talc to try to force them to dry.  some people favor keeping them wet.  some people try to get them to dry out and up.  everyone has a different approach to dealing with this and their way works for them.  special thanks go out to joe baremore for an anecdote that cheered me up considerably on this front.

below is the real damage.  you can see the front where i hit the curb, but rest assured, it reaches around my back.  the rash itself is not impressive but the swelling is positively amazing.  my right hip flexor, with insertion point a full three inches below the impact site, has been numb since the accident from the pressure of the hematoma.  just this morning, it started to feel back to normal.  the swelling is still prominent.

- - - posted by scott

5/9/2006 8:36:48 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [1]  | 

I'm sort of up and around.  I'll try to post something later today about this weekend.  in the meantime, consider this an open thread.  go to the comments.  introduce a topic.  discuss amongst yourselves.  

5/9/2006 8:52:58 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [4]  | 
 Friday, May 05, 2006

a few odds and ends, and a short post as time is somewhat limited.  those who regularly imbibe from the font of knowledge and wisdom that is the racing union blog are undoubtedly aware that greenbelt has begun.  an old tradition and a really fun race.  i was reminded by both promoter and officials of my earliest attendance at this race in a t-shirt and hair net helmet.  fun times.  the racing is always a challenge, and no matter what the signage implies, it's never a picnic

officials for week 1 were janet and stefan.  friendly as always.  thye kept things roughly on schedule and resist the tendency to read us the entire rule book on the start line before letting us go.  for that alone, all racers should take a moment to say thank you.

in spite of what was said here, the situation was not all that bad.  here we several happy cyclists in line. 

races rolled out, with union boots ont he ground, and all seemed happy.

also of interest is a brand-spanking new electronic registraiton system. 

having done some reporting on this in the past, i figured it would be worth a few moments of time to check in and see how this new thing works.  the users were singularly occupied with the system and did not have time to give me a full tour, but it has the basics: run from a laptop, scanning is done with a usb bar code scanner and a network hub links a printer to the laptop. 

scanning is quick.  unlike eric's system, it was not printing standard releases.  it probably could.  i am going to go out on a limb and make a guess about how this system is set up.  i suspect that the system is bound tightly to a database, and the datbase is built from previous years of greenbelt attendance, as opposed to be being built off of the usac registration database.  i think this probably has some advantages from the developer's point of view.  route 1 has one of the better web sites i have seen, and i'm not just talking about cycling web sites.  i suspect they have designed their system around an easy dump of the data and an easy update of the web site.  i have no information here, i am only speculating. 

the main point though is that we now have multiple promoters who have, on their own initiaitive, ginned up electronic reg systems with bar code scanning and reporting capacity.  i offer congratulations to both of them, and i think people should begin actively considering the merits and pitfalls of adopting some sort of system throughout the region.  there are arguments against it, and some of them are exceedingly well reasoned.  i have heard officials worry about additional materiel in the race kit (e.g. generators, laptops, printers, scanners), handling the materials under adverse weather conditions, and backup protocols under the worst case scenario.  i have seen the systems fail, and the inevitable reversion by the promoters back to traditional paper processing.  but as the systems were tested in the field, they seemed to do better.  my guess is the landscape will look much different at the end of the season than it did before the season began.

shifting gears slightly, the velo club of baltimore is holding the inaugural hampstead cycling classic.  this race is being hosted by a community that is behind the event.  we have already seen some high profile races evaporate this year.  the environment is not one of great expansion.  i am hopeful that people will turn out to support a new event on the calendar and a community that is embracing you.  don't just go to the race.  bring the family, buy some lunch, spend sometime, show some love.  if you're low on rubles, spend the $0.39 to send a letter to the mayor thanking him for allowing you to come and race.  the flyer for this race on their website has only been posted in a proprietary format.  while supporting the event, the union formally expresses it's displeasure with the digital hegemon that vcb has embraced to communciate it's critical event data.  we offer a translation of the data into a publicly accessible format courtesy of an anonymous contributor.  though not truly open source, this should be easier for those whose interests tend more towards open source:

hampstead_flier.pdf (494.34 KB)

critical note which should be obvious but won't be unless i say it explicitly: this is not meant in any way to supercede their information.  for definitive information on the hampstead event, we suggest you visit the vcb web page and the electronic registration page for the event.

- - - posted by scott

5/5/2006 10:23:58 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [1]  | 
 Thursday, May 04, 2006

there's a common school of thought that people are not willing to share.

For those that aren't part of the Wattage-Geek community, most power-trained athletes would rather lend you their own mothers for a few nights then let you see their WKO files, particularly those from a race with sustained and max efforts.

the union acknowledges the uphill struggle that awaits it.  if people hoard data, how likely is it that they'll share anything more substantial with others.  the lessons of collectivism applies to all things.  in that spirit, i offer the following: 

sggreenbelt_5_3_2006.csv (79.02 KB)

for what it's worth, i got smoked in this race mostly because i did not ride it very intelligently.  there were one or two solid attacks in the first few laps.  i got caught out several times behind groups of cyclists who were racing passively and could not get around them to follow attacks; ended up spending a lot of gas trying to get across.  i might very well have done better by marking several specific cyclists but i don't find that sort of racing fun so i tend not to do it.  but that would have been better than what evolved: i ended up spending a lot of the race doing what i like least which is chasing.  the lead to the break was steady for a while 15sec, 20sec, 23 sec, and then doubled over a single lap and it was all over.  with about three to go, the people in the pack were just watching each other.  that was sort of ridiculous since the race pays nothing and the top five positions were all up the road. 

the chasing and bridging was hopefully good training for poolesville.  we'll find out shortly.

- - - posted by scott

5/4/2006 10:57:12 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [14]  | 

   the "C" race went just under 12 miles, according to my computer. this means it was something like 8 laps. average speed was around 22mph. my impression of the course was that really the only place to make moves was in the one 90 degree trun at the bottom of that hill on the back side of the course. there was one rider who stayed at the front for most of the race, with the rest of us jockeying for 2nd-4th places behind him.i got into a break-away at about 3 laps to go with 2-3 other riders, 2 of whom seemed to be working together.  We dropped one of these with a little more than 2 laps to go. it came down to three of us in the final sprint, and I just popped. thanks go out to comrade Roy for reeling me in at the begining of the race, when I was all over the front of the group and wasting lots of energy which probably would have come in handy in the final sprint. in retrospect i probably should have jumped a couple of times during the last 2 laps, just to test the other 2 riders with me. dropping one of them would have meant a second place finish, and if neither one went i could have pulled an attack. this comrade needs to learn some tactics to go along with his patriotic fervor and commitment to revolutionary principles!

-joe

5/4/2006 10:46:58 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
 Wednesday, May 03, 2006
Today comrades Joe, Josh, Scott and I participated in the first race of this year's Greenbelt series of training races.  Our executariat raced with the A group and the rest of us with the C proles.  There, Joe quickly established himself at the front and I hung on for a while until a split formed and I dropped off the back.  As far as I could tell, the field was too thinned to form much of an organized chase (if we could even organize such a thing).   Josh and I later found ourselves in a small group with a couple of other riders, but by then the leaders were well ahead.  I thought the pace was a little slow and rode away for a lap, but couldn't stay away on my own.  Joe and two others lapped us just before the final lap.  Although Josh and I pulled off, I somehow missed seeing the finish, but Joe reports that after his heroic efforts throughout the race he had to settle for third in the sprint.  I'm confident he'll be a real force in the remainder of the series.

We watched the A & B races from the sidelines.  In the A race, a break formed quickly and gained a lot of time on the main group.  Scott reports he barely missed getting in the break, and we could see him valiantly trying to organize a chase, which regretfully never really came together.

To the future, comrades!

end communication.

--roy

5/3/2006 10:56:54 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
 Tuesday, May 02, 2006

the racing union re-asserts it's position in the vanguard of the revolution in cycling.

while some are content to simply complain, we offer a series of proposals to help bring cycling into line with the values of it's participants.  we have no doubt the special interests (the predatory, capitalist cabal of promoters and the unanswering bureaucracy of our local association) will fight these proposals tooth and nail.  we seek nothing less than a revolution in cycling, an inversion of the existing power pyramid and a return of authority to cyclists.  we ask for the support of all of you towards these proposals, which we will advance at the annual meeting this fall.  help us bring a new day to cycling in the mid-atlantic.

proposal #1: independent verification and auditing of all mabra race results

there has been considerable concern regarding the timeliness and/or accuracy of race results. literally thousands of promoter/official hours are sunk into resolving whether racer x or racer y is really the appropriate recipient of 39th place.  given the absolutely critical importance of proper results data, the current levels of safeguards in place can hardly be deemed adequate.  we offer a three pronged solution to the current procedures in place

  • retention of a subcontractor as a finish results auditor.
  • creation of a mabra board member position: race results ombudsman
  • creation of a paid mabra position: media archivist

finish results auditor: we propose that mabra contract with one of the big five accounting firms.  this firm would function as an external auditor to existing usac officials and their actions.  they would be formally tasked with validating the procedures and results used to generate unofficial and official race results.  they would function independently and would not answer to the mabra board, but rather to the racer ombudsman (described below).  the firm would also be tasked with providing quarterly reports of it's monitoring activities, and any resultant findings, to the racing community at large.

race results ombudsman: we propose that mabra create a full time, salaried board position to interface between officials, promoters and racers.  the disposition of this official would be to represent racers and advocate on their behalf.  the ombudsman would also be tasked with several additional functions.  the writing of a bi-weekly summary of activity would help racers to better understand how the race scoring process works, and what is being done to ensure that results are timely, accurate and fair.  full accounting of any arbitration activities would be described.  a monthly summary would also be prepared in advance for each mabra bod meeting so that this issue can receive the attention is deserves.

media archivist: since all race finishes are currently captured on video, and in light of the staggering volume of race paperwork that mabra and the uscf see fit to employ, it defies reason that the video tape from each race is not captured, stored, labelled and made available on the mabra web site.  this proposal seeks to create a full time, salaried archivist who will compile and catalog digital video of each race finish and produce and maintain a section of the mabra web site dedicated to the display of raw race finish footage.  this added layer of transparency should work in tandem with the previously mentioned measures to add confidence to the race reports that are currently generated. 

we find it important at this point to denote that this is not an attempt to denegrate the performance of mabra officials or the current mabra board of directors.  rather, these added measures and safeguards should serve to free up these harried volunteers to actually perform their existing tasks.  the newly created positions will bring an entire tier of dedicated staff to solving these crucial problems. 

the costs for this proposal will undoubtedly be tremendous.  but speaking rhetorically, is there any price that can be put on a true rendering of the achievement of each racer?  is there any price that can be affixed to verifying that the outcome of a given event is rendered with fidelity?  we believe the answer is no and humbly submit that this is not only a just but necessary change in mabra structure. 

proposal #2: mandatory drug testing at all mabra sanctioned events

there have been multiple claims over the last several years that certain riders are using performance enhancing products.  this is a damning charge.  the most unfortunate aspect of this type of charge is that it is impossible to negate.  there is no system in place to test for the presence of banned compounds at the local or regional levels of cycling.  while we firmly believe that drug use is not a problem at the local level, we can never be certain.  this uncertainty is what leads, in many cases, to speculation and, regrettably, character defamation.

given that there are clear rules regarding what cannot be taken (ref: www.usada.org) but virtually no enforcement, we propose that mabra adopt a demonstration program of testing.  the testing will follow current usada procedures and use approved facilities, as opposed to introducing new protocols or standards.  this is proposed as an increase in monitoring as opposed to a change in procedure.

after considerable discussion, we have two alternative proposals regarding whom the testing should be carried out on.  the first simply states that the top three in each field will provide samples according to current usada guidelines.  the samples would be collected by a uscf official who was on the race crew specifically to collect, inventory and manage these samples.  transfer of the samples would be accomplished by the official under the oversight of the chief referee and in coordination with the labaratory which would be processing the samples.  an alternative proposal, which would admittedly be substantially cheaper, would be to only test those racers in category 5 and juniors events.  the rationale for this is that an active intervention with beginning cyclists will yield the most benefits in the long run, and deterrence and behaviour modification with experienced cyclists is not as likely to offer the same return on investment.  our preference would be a more thorough testing regimen that covered all fields, but we acknowledge that the substantial costs that mabra will inevitably bear in conducting this important and necessary monitoring will cause people to look for ways to make the process easier. 

we believe that supporting this initiative will help to instill confidence that races are being conducted on an even playing field.

proposal #3: promoters must offer child care both before and during master's events

many cyclists are unable to participate in events because of family committments.  the inability to find a babysitter, a last minute cancellation, a relative who suddenly takes sick; any one of these could be the cause of a race day no-show.  we propose that promoters must retain the services of licensed, bonded babysitters who can look after children while racers are registering, warming up, racing and cooling down. 

this proposal has two clear benefits.  first, cyclists can race without worry about arrangements for care of their young ones.  they need not worry about whether their plans will be shifting at the last minute.  secondly, this will clearly help to make events more family friendly.  some children dread the inevitable death march to and from the race.  in place of current situation which ranges from abandonment to forced child labor in feed zones, we will see constructive games and educational diversions.  for younger kids, multimedia programs concerning alternative transportation can be made available.  for older kids, learning how to score a race or replace a bottom bracket might offer a step up in moving on the next level of becoming a helpful uscf official or mechanic. 

we ask for your support in this proposal which we see as a win-win situation for kids and parents.

proposal #4: creation of a casual dress code for all cyclists while at at mabra events

mabra has, over the last several years, sought sponsorship for both races and ranking systems such as the bar.  in seeking this sponsorship, mabra has sought to assure potential sponsors that the racing demographic overlaps with their intended customer base.  the racing union strongly disavows the contention that sponsorship is beneficial to amateur sports.  our manifesto lays out a very clear case for this.  however, we support the goal of improving races and racing throughout the mid-atlantic.  to that end, and given that mabra is insistent on pursuing sponsorship, we feel that mabra can, and should, do considerably more to help ensure that  the race day environment is appealing to potential sponsors. 

in looking for actions which can be taken, one need not re-invent the wheel.  other sports have confronted these issues and have come up with well thought out solutions which we can implement immediately.  the best example of this is the recent decision by the national basketball association to institute a casual dress policy for all athletes who are at an event, in any capacity, but not explicitly suited to take the court.  the dress code itself is described here and examples of it's newsworthiness are found here and here.

many cyclists attend events in a number of capacities.  they may be in the feed zone, waiting to help their teammates with nutrition or hydration.  they may be spectators, who were shut out of electronic registration but want to see their peers lock horns on the gridiron.  or they may be racing three races that day and find themselves killing the 4 hours between the end of their last event and the start of their next event. 

in all of these cases, having the cyclists adopt a business casual dress code would ensure a professional looking atmosphere for the event.  the popular image of cyclists as goatee-sporting, mountain dew swilling, pierced and tattoo having gen x-ers is not bringing in one red cent.  only by showing that mabra is truly committed to presenting cycling as a mature, urbane, socially representative sport, can we possibly move ahead in acquiring the millions of sponsorship dollars needed to advance the sport locally.

there is a precedent for this proposal.  uscf officials are adamant and vocal in mandating that any and all cyclists at a race who are on a bike must have a helmet.  this is regardless of whether they are currently racing, racing at another time, or not racing at all during the day but merely spectating.  our proposal is entirely in keeping with the spirit of this rule; it's only the item(s) or garment(s) in question that are being regulated. 

summary: the racing union seeks your support in adopting these proposals, and some subsequent proposals we will roll out shortly.  we will, to a limited extent, consider feedback, potential modifications or amendments.  however, we feel the proposals are very well reasoned and articulated.  those cyclists considering major modifications should submit alternative proposals as per the guidelines provided by the mabra secretariat in advance of the meeting. 

5/2/2006 10:21:53 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [1]  | 
 Monday, May 01, 2006

racing union communication: fd5437-hf6-86jfut

date of issue: 05/01/2005, day 132 of the revolution

begin communicaiton

the supreme council for the revolution in cycling and social order issues the red star for sacrifice towards the cause to comrades line and rottier.  this is issued for their racing persistence in the face of injury.  these citizens are demonstrating the principles of the union through their actions, and serve as worthy role models for all young pioneers who aspire to race.  they are heroes of the union.

end communication

5/1/2006 12:22:51 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 

sometimes it seems as if you woke up in a foreign land.  everyone is speaking a different language, you don't recognize the streets or buildings.  the culture is alien, and your racing union issued rubles, which weren't much use before, are now totally useless as they do not seem to buy anything.  that's sort of where i am at.  have you seen this shit

it seems like the national gestalt is that things are going to hell so you just do whatever you please.  and this actually maps onto the behaviour and views of cyclists as exhibited during most group rides, commutes, training session, et. al. that I come into contact with.  stop sign?  so what.  sprinting over the yellow line into oncoming traffic?  de rigeur!  riding ten abreast on small country roads with 20-30 cars lined up behind you honking?  you betcha!

this is not a trend you can buck.  rather, this is a wave, a veritable tsunami of lawlessness, that I would recommend that all good citizens ride with vigor.  it may be a race to the bottom, but it will be fun, and good intentions won't get you far as things deteriorate.  I recommend that people act, forthwith, to assert their independence from authority.  if this is the way the jackals want it, i say we give it to them. 

please consider this blog post to function effectively as my signing statement.  i hereby assert that the various state, local and federal entities have conspired to control transportation systems and that this control is inherently outside the scope of their legal authority.  i assert that i retain the sole authority to determine limits on my cycling.  the current system of traffic control which includes but is not limited to lane markings, stop signs, traffic lights, curbs, speed limits fundamentally infringes on my rights as a citizen.  my interpretation of my rights of citizenship include the decision making authority regarding when, where and how i ride my bicycle.  though i acknowledge that the laws have been passed by various local, state and federal legislatures, i do not accept their authority over me in this matter.  i hold that i am the only source of limits regarding how and where i ride my bicycle.

i futher assert that the sanctioning body for cycling in the us has exceeded their authority to dictate details of how one may particiapte in activities.  no sleeveless jerseys??!!  how can it be the case that they can tell you whether your arms are covered with a spandex/poly blend.  next they'll be instituting a raglan cut with their usac logo prominently placed, and which derailleur to ride or tire to use.  while acknowledging that these rules are in the rulebook, i follow the president's noble lead in clarifying the jurisdiction i allow over my actions.  in accepting my usac license, i offer a statement that i do not agree with the usac interpretation that they may set rules regarding helmets, field limits, clothing, penalties, event scoring, event permits, prizes, payouts, start of a race, or rider conduct.  i believe that these rules are an infringement on my rights as a rider and racer and I emphatically reject them. 

as a general summary, i assert sole authority to make rules regarding how and when my actions can be controlled.  it seems to work for the current administration, so i'm hopeful it will work for me as well.

- - - posted by scott

5/1/2006 12:11:33 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
 Friday, April 28, 2006

on wednesday night, i had a very enjoyable ride at hains point with comrades josh and alec.  the weather was really nice and we just sort of rolled around, chatting and telling jokes.  we ran into squadra coppi president, brother kosta, who worked with us on the quicksilver winter solstice series.  we talked about revolution, and getting the word out to the people. 

thursday night, i made the herndon ride by the skin of my teeth.  I managed to fill two bottles and roll into the parking lot just as the riders were heading out.  the first hour of the ride was, unfortunately, defined for me by my inability to part with some excess fluids which I had built up.  I tried to jump up ahead but the pack was moving fairly quickly.  it ended up becoming a crisis.  i stopped with some other riders and ended up having to chase.  I am formally referring one of our brethren to the supreme council for adjudicating cycling actions on the charge of "leaving a brother behind while he has stopped to pee and making him chase".  the council rarely smiles upon such actions.

however, the unifying feature of both rides was the talk of social change amongst the riders.  it seems clear the message of the revolution is gaining traction.  one cynic quipped that we are proselytizing into lactic acid-addled minds in an attempt to sneak our message by.  this is patently false and we reject this claim in the strongest possible terms.  the message of the racing union stands on its own merits, and though it does not find fertile ground in all minds, will eventually be recognized by all as prevailing wisdom.  if sending someone across to the break so they can remind those riders about the message of the union is considered wrong, we don't want to be right.

today we start moving into phase 2 of our communications operation.  below is a wallet sized manifesto. 

it's would be ideal for a small desktop frame, to show your co-workers that your loyalty to the party is not in doubt.  it can be laminated and slipped into a jersey pocket.  you can share it with people at rest-stops or on the trail.  you can give it to children or fellow cyclists when you stop to help them fix a flat tire.

bring the word of the racing union to the people. 

- - - posted by scott

4/28/2006 10:07:53 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
 Thursday, April 27, 2006

i have previously described the differences between those communities that are receptive to alternative transportation and those that are not.  for those with a short memory, prior posts can be found here and with considerably more detail here.  the latter post had voluminous links to alternative transportation coordinators, planning maps, bicycle asset maps, etc.  the former post has a very simple graphic which i feel perfectly captures the gestalt of this issue:

there was also a small shout-out to a local group that is doing a tremendous job at advocacy: fairfax advocates for better bicycling or FABB.  their staff has been working very hard to bring about change, and it appears that they are having some success.  peep this:

Dear Racing Union:

Thank you for your email  letting the me know of your support for funding bicycle items as part of the County's budget. I wanted to take this opportunity to update you on the Board's actions regarding these funding items (collectively known as Fairfax County's "Comprehensive Bicycle Initiative" or CBI) in the County's FY07 Budget.

Following my initial request in December 2005, staff from the County's Department of Transportation provided cost estimates for these various elements of the CBI in time for them to be considered during this year's budget cycle.

On February 27, 2006, when County Executive Anthony Griffin presented his proposed FY2007 Budget to the Board of Supervisors, I moved that funding for the CBI become the first Consideration Item put before the Board as it deliberated the County's budget for the upcoming year.

I am pleased that, when the Board marked-up the County Executive's Proposed FY07 Budget on April 24, funding was included for a Bicycle Coordinator position along with $375,000 allocated to provide an inventory of County bicycle facilities and to develop a Fairfax County Bicycle Facilities Map. I have also met with staff from the County's Department of Transportation and have asked that funding for bicycle projects be included in the Transportation Bond scheduled to go before voters in November 2007. The bicycle projects selected for the bond will be identified as part of the inventory of facilities that the Board is funding in the FY07 Budget.

I am committed to the viability of bicycling as a means of transportation in Fairfax County and appreciate your giving me the opportunity to share with you the Board's actions on this subject.

Sincerely-

Gerry Connolly, Chairman
Fairfax County Board of Supervisors
 
now i could go on and on regarding whether this is a significant event or not.  but you don't want to hear it and i don't want to write it.  i do take the time to contact my elected representatives about a host of issues.  and i expect, yes expect, to get something back, even if it's a form letter.  this letter is a sign of good intentions.  i will be happier when those intentions are actualized. 
 
but there's something here that i think a lot of people overlook.  i see a ton of bitching on email forums and web sites about how bad the situation is between bikes and [insert any non-bicycle mode of conveyance here].  people grouse, but they rarely do anything.  this generally ticks me off, but in this case, i am considerably more sympathetic.  i can see how people would be overwhelmed.  how can one person or a small group or even a large group change whole traffic infrastructure systems?  how can they change what seems to be a totally ingrained attitude about transportation?  the task is so massive, where would one even begin?
 
the answer in this case is that one begins by using the tools of the system**.  this is not widely uinderstood.  start going to planning board meetings.  start going to zoning board meetings.  you know that new 100 unit townhouse complex that they just started building over at [insert any location in loudoun county here]?  you can't stop it.  no how, no way.  that process probably began at least 10 years ago with decisions made by zoning boards and planning boards.  the builder would have had to make public appearances and describe and defend their plan for construction.  they would have received the go ahead for land clearing, grading, and building.  you can be mad as hell, but unless you were there when the process began, you're out of the loop at this point.  and crying about it is a waste of saline.  cities and counties and states need long range plans, and they act like battleships: once they get momentum they tend to continue in that direction and turning them can take a while.
 
but here's the wrinkle that's worth your attention.  FABB understands this process and is building a base from which they can possibly make substantive changes.  they turn out people for planning board meetings, they encourage correspondence with elected officials and they are working within the system to add voices who will be advocates for things that are important to us.
they don't necessarily need your money, but they could really use your time. 
 
if you would like to see some changes to the way things work, you might consider visiting their web site and checking out their objectives which are pretty reasonable.  consider writing your elected officials and asking them to strongly consider the proposed actions.  and follow up with them to monitor progress.***
 
- - - posted by scott
 
** for those who fear this borders on collusion, try to visualize what i am describing as bringing down the man, from the inside, using his own tools.  is that better?
 
*** this will be interpretted by the haters as a concession: the revolution has not accomplished it's desired goal so we have to limp around and enact civil provisions with incremental change using the filthy tools of "the man" whom all responsible citizens justly revile.  i would draw your attention to the grand canyon.  it wasn't made in a day no matter what these losers think.  all big changes begin somewhere.  be a part of the solution.
4/27/2006 2:39:19 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  |